'Is there a word such as lightweightness?' and 'Is there a good translation for the German word Leichtgewichtigkeit ' are quite different questions. The best translations are usually not word-for-word. The examples you give in your link are not of consistent accuracy. 1, 5 & 8 are incorrect. Notice that 'lightweight' is a compound adjective whereas 'light weight' is adjective + noun. There are so many questions on this website. There is so many questions on this website. The former "sounds right," but the contracted form of the latter does as well: There's so many Etymology: Middle English erre, French errer, Provençal errar, Spanish errar, Italian errare, Latin errāre prehistoric *ersāre, cognate with Gothic aírzjan transitive to lead astray, Old High German irrôn transitive and intransitive (German irren). †1. intransitive. To ramble, roam, stray, wander. Obsolete. I need a slang word which means someone addicted to playing video or computer games. Could gameaholic work? It can't be nerd or geek because although those expressions denote someone who is obses. It's just that OP never mentioned adverbial use in the first place (as in I can see more clearly now, where it modifies the verb to see ). Not that anything you say is untrue, so far as I can see, but we could reasonably assume OP was only asking about adjectival usage. Where an answer, for example, for can be either clearer or more clear than other answers. And to be honest, where I don't. In the phrase “to err on the side of…”, the meaning of err is closer to that of the Old French errer, which is “to stray”. The image implied is that, if you can't for sure walk on the right line, you might want to err on one particular side rather than the other. So, just to make sure I answer your actual question: no, “to err on the side of…” does not indicate wrongdoing. Microsoft Community There's an ellipsis at the beginning of the sentence (John Lawler tells us that this is conversational deletion): [He is] four pounds if he’s an ounce. Otherwise this is a perfectly ordinary conditional, described this way in Chapter 10, ‘Rhetorical Conditionals’, of Renaat Declerck and Susan Reed, Conditionals: A Comprehensive Empirical Analysis, 2001, p.345. (Their terminology rests on. I've done a bit of searching but cannot find a definitive distinction between contemporaneous and simultaneous. I personally use the words interchangeably. Am I correct in doing so? In German there is a pattern for counting items from the end of a list. The last item is das letzte , the one before is das vorletzte , the one before that is das vorvorletzte and for each othe.